Open Society Justice Initiative—Litigation - Open Society Justice Initiative

Litigation

Justice Initiative lawyers have represented scores of individuals and groups before domestic and international human rights courts and tribunals around the world. These cases seek not only to vindicate individual claims, but to establish and strengthen the law’s protection for all.

Filter by:

Sort by

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child Court of Justice of the European Union Domestic Courts ECOWAS Community Court of Justice European Court of Human Rights Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Inter-American Court of Human Rights International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda UN Committee against Torture UN Human Rights Committee UN Human Rights Council African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights European Committee of Social Rights OECD Austrian National Contact Point Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

Angola Argentina Azerbaijan Bahamas Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cote D'Ivoire Czech Republic Denmark Dominican Republic Egypt Equatorial Guinea France Gambia Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Israel Italy Kazakhstan Kenya Kyrgyzstan Lithuania Mauritania Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nigeria North Macedonia Paraguay Peru Poland Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Sierra Leone Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Tanzania Turkey Turkmenistan United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uzbekistan

3 litigation

Court of Justice of the European Union European Court of Human Rights Inter-American Court of Human Rights UN Human Rights Committee UN Human Rights Council European Committee of Social Rights Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Haiti Hungary Israel Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lithuania Peru Rwanda Slovenia Spain Switzerland United Kingdom Clear all

Big Brother Watch v. United Kingdom

The European Court of Human Rights held that the UK’s bulk interception regime violated the right to privacy for its lack of sufficient oversight and safeguards.

Last update: June 19, 2017

Etxebarria v. Spain

A challenge to Spain’s anti-terrorism detention regulations argues that holding two suspects incommunicado without independent legal and medical advice created conditions for abuse.

Last update: October 06, 2014

Human Rights Monitoring Institute v. Republic of Lithuania

The Lithuanian Customs Department refused to disclose information that might have exposed its complicity in the CIA's rendition, detention and torture programs.

Last update: February 27, 2013

Get In Touch

Subscribe for Updates About Our Work