Expelled Dominicans and Haitians v. Dominican Republic
Statelessness in the Dominican Republic
In 2000, the authorities in the Dominican Republic arbitrarily detained and then expelled hundreds of people to Haiti. They included documented and undocumented Dominicans and foreigners, many of whom had their permanent residence in the Dominican Republic, where they also had their main family and economic ties. The expulsions were carried out arbitrarily and with no legal appeals. Those with proper documents were not even given time to produce them. The expulsions were part of a long history of discrimination against Dominicans of Haitian descent. The Inter-American Court found that the expulsions violated human rights standards.
For the past ten years the Dominican Republic has implemented a series of constitutional amendments, high court rulings, and legislative reform restricting access to Dominican nationality for persons of Haitian descent. Many of the new rules apply retroactively, whether by design or in practice. Discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities in the Dominican Republic has been widely reported by the United Nations and other bodies.
The Inter-American Court had previously addressed the Dominican Republic’s mistreatment of the population of Haitian descent in its 2005 decision in the Yean and Bosico v. Dominican Republic case, ruling that the migratory status of a child’s parents can never justify deprivation of nationality and that children cannot inherit the migratory status of their parents.
In September 2013, the Dominican Constitutional Tribunal in the case of Deguis (TC-168-13) stripped thousands of Dominican citizens of foreign descent of their Dominican nationality, by retroactively implementing an interpretation under which any child born to undocumented parents would fall within the “in transit” exception to jus soli citizenship. The Constitutional Court ordered the government to review birth registries and establish a process to implement the decision. In response to international pressure the Government enacted Law 169-14 intended to establish a special regime of naturalization for those affected by the ruling.
Open Society Justice Initiative Involvement
The Justice Initiative provided an expert opinion from Julia Harrington Reddy, senior legal officer, explaining the relevant international standards applicable to the situation. These included the limitations on state discretion to regulate nationality, the duty of states to avoid statelessness, and the prohibition on arbitrary deprivation of nationality. The opinion stressed the discriminatory nature of deprivation of nationality in the case as well as failures of due process.
On October 22, 2014, the Inter-American Court issued its ruling. The Court concluded that both the decision of the Dominican Constitutional Tribunal in the Deguis case, and Law 169-14 which was designed to address the humanitarian and political implications of the Deguis decision, contravened the Dominican Republic’s obligations under the American Convention, including the rights to nationality, juridical personality, personal liberty, privacy, due process, equal protection before the law, freedom of movement and residence, rights of the family and the child, and the guarantee of non-discrimination.
Judgment of the Inter-American Court, published on October 22, 2014.
Public hearings held in the case.
Expert opinion submitted.
Inter-American Commission submits the Expelled case to the Inter-American Court.
Petition filed before the Inter-American Commission by the International Human Rights Clinic of Berkeley University, the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) and the National Coalition for the rights of Haitians (NCHR)
Yean and Bosico v. Dominican Republic
This is a case brought by two Dominican girls of Haitian descent who were denied Dominican nationality in spite of the fact that both were born in the country, which should legally entitle them to citizenship.
Justice Initiative Welcomes First UN Human Rights Committee Ruling on the Right to Nationality for Children
The UN Human Rights Committee has found, in the case of Zhao v. Netherlands, that the Netherlands violated the rights of a child, Denny Zhao, by assigning him the status of “unknown” nationality when his birth in the country was registered.
Open Society Justice Initiative Joins Statement of Concern on Assam Registration Crisis
Over 100 international and national civil society groups have signed a joint-letter calling for an international response to a India's troubled review of its National Register of Citizens in Assam.
Saving Newborn Rohingya from a Legal Abyss
The government of Bangladesh has already promised to uphold its obligation to register newborn Rohingya refugees. For the sake of international law—and the children’s future—it must stop dragging its feet.