Bubon v. Russia

European Court of Human Rights
Russian Federation
Case Manager

Transparency of Crime Statistics

A legal researcher was writing an article on prostitution and policing in the Khabarovsk region of Russia, and requested statistics on sexual exploitation crimes from the police. His request was denied on the basis that only senior government officials could have access to the data. He took his case to the European Court of Human Rights. The Justice Initiative argued that the right of access to information included crime statistics. While the Court accepted that such statistics could be requested, it concluded that the right to information does not impose an obligation to collect information upon the request of an individual, particularly when a considerable amount of work is involved. 


Konstantin Bubon is a legal researcher who regularly publishes articles in a number of Russian law journals and magazines. In May 2009, while researching the issue of prostitution in the Khabarovsk region, Bubon asked local police authorities for statistics regarding the prosecution of sexual exploitation offenses during a specified nine-year period. In a written request to the head of the police department, Bubon noted that he sought only general data as part of empirical research for an assigned article.

In June 2009, after receiving no response from the police, Bubon filed a claim in the district court. He complained that the police authorities’ failure to provide the statistical data was unlawful, as he had not requested access to state secrets or otherwise confidential information.  Bubon relied on a Russian statute giving citizens the right to request from state authorities “information on their activities” without needing to further explain the request or prove a personal interest in obtaining the information (so long as the requested data does not constitute a state secret).

In July 2009, the police department formally denied Bubon’s request, arguing that it could only provide crime statistics to senior government officials. The police claimed that individuals and legal entities were not permitted to access to such data.  Bubon then filed an unsuccessful inquiry with the Federal Service of State Statistics, which responded that authorities from the Khabarovsk region had not submitted any relevant crime statistics. As a result, the police department remained in exclusive possession of the requested information.  

The domestic courts ultimately ruled against Bubon, finding that the police department’s denial of information did not affect the applicant’s personal interests—despite his claim that there was no such requirement under either Russian law or Article 10 of the European Convention.

Open Society Justice Initiative Involvement

In November 2010, the Open Society Justice Initiative submitted third-party comments on the case to the European Court of Human Rights. Information on certain comparative laws and practices discussed in the brief was collected with pro bono assistance from the US-based law firm Ropes & Gray, the Canadian Media Lawyers Association, and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union.


Status of right to know. Access to information is widely acknowledged by regional and domestic legal systems.

No personal interest required. Requiring information requesters to prove a personal interest in the information is not consistent with the jurisprudence of the European Court or comparative law.

Access to crime statistics. Many democratic countries in Europe and elsewhere publish and disseminate detailed statistical information concerning crime, either proactively or upon request.

February 02, 2017

In a judgment delivered on 2 February 2017, the European Court concluded that there was no violation of the Convention. The government had claimed that it was not possible to provide the data breakdown the applicant wanted without substantial effort. The Court accepted the government’s view of the facts, and concluded that Article 10 “does not impose an obligation to collect information upon the applicant’s request, particularly when, as in the present case, a considerable amount of work is involved.” 

February 02, 2017

The European Court of Human Rights issues judgment in the case. 

November 02, 2010

The Justice Initiative submits third-party comments on the case.

July 06, 2010

The case is communicated to the Russian government.

October 11, 2009

Applicant files petition with the European Court of Human Rights.

September 16, 2009

The Khabarovsk Regional Court upholds the judgment of the lower court.

August 04, 2009

The Tsentralniy District Court of Khabarovsk dismisses the applicant’s claim.

July 18, 2009

The Information center of the Police Department denies access to the information.

June 26, 2009

The applicant lodges a claim with the Tsentralniy District Court of Khabarovsk.

May 12, 2009

The applicant files a freedom of information request with the Khabarovsk Regional Police Department.

November 02, 2010
Written Comments Download the 11-page document. Download

Related Cases

Related Work

Get In Touch

Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates About Our Work

By entering your email address and clicking “Submit,” you agree to receive updates from the Open Society Justice Initiative about our work. To learn more about how we use and protect your personal data, please view our privacy policy.