The UK's Prevent Strategy Review is Fundamentally Flawed
The Open Society Justice Initiative has stressed its lack of confidence in the UK government's review of its Prevent strategy "for supporting people vulnerable to being drawn into terrorism."
In a letter to Chris Felton, the deputy director of the Independent Review of the Prevent Strategy, Amrit Singh of the Justice Initiative raised concerns over the process, including lack of independence of its head, Lord Carlile of Berriew, and the Review’s narrow terms of reference, writing that these flaws "render the Review wholly inadequate."
"These defects fatally undermine the credibility of the Review and its ability to consider the evidence and analysis of Prevent’s numerous structural flaws," she wrote.
The Justice Initiative declined to respond the questionnaire that comprises the Review's call for evidence, which closed on Monday, December 9, instead submitting the attached letter, with a copy of its 2016 report Eroding Trust: The UK’s Prevent Counter Extremism Strategy in Health and Education.
The report includes a detailed legal analysis of Prevent under international human rights law and relevant domestic legal provisions as well as seventeen case studies. It concluded that Prevent creates a serious risk of human rights violations in the health and education sectors. It recommended, inter alia, that the UK government establish an independent public inquiry—with civil society participation—into the Prevent strategy and associated rights violations.
UPDATE, December 20, 2019: The UK government has told Rights Watch UK that Lord Carlile will no longer lead the Prevent program review. In a letter regarding a legal challenge to his appointment, the government’s legal advisers said his work had concluded. The letter added that the terms of reference for the Prevent review are also being reconsidered.
Appointment of UK's Prevent Strategy Reviewer 'Undermines Credibility'
The Justice Initiative and ten other groups say the top lawyer chosen to review the UK's counter extremism strategy lacks sufficient independence.
Eroding Trust: The UK’s Prevent Counter-Extremism Strategy in Health and Education
Since 2015, the UK’s counter-extremism strategy has imposed a statutory duty on health and education professionals to report individuals at risk of being drawn into terrorism.
Inhuman and Unnecessary: Human Rights Violations in Dutch High-Security Prisons in the Context of Counterterrorism
Prisoners in the Netherlands suspected or convicted of terrorism offenses face aggressive and intrusive security measures, regardless of the threat they might pose.